

While any celebrity has a right to an obituary, posthumous
encomiums by way of comparison with other greats should not happen just because
of the bankruptcy of a particular age in producing truly great individuals.
What defines Steve Jobs? The fact that he could make people
go crazy about his company’s products?
If marketing is what makes you great, then our Indian
politicians are the greatest, because they market themselves so well that even
after their failures in one term after another, we keep voting them back to
power. If making a new product is what makes you great, then there are many new
products being invented everywhere in the world. Yes, the claim to launching
the first personal computer goes to Jobs, but he was not behind its invention;
he was the chief of the company that invented it. Any man heading the company
that has a product to sell can do what he did.
To those who think he revolutionised cell phones, the fact
is he just re-packaged his products by mixing up what was already out there in
the form of already available gadgets/software like Blackberry, Palm, Windows,
etc. A man becomes truly great for humankind and his passing away deserves mass
mourning only if he has done something to better the lives of his fellow
beings, overcoming personal greed and lust for power.
While all of us
take our newborn kids to have ‘Do boond zindagi ki’, to save our kids
from the life-crippling polio virus, very few would know why those life drops
come for free. There are many other diseases, medication for which does not
come even at a reasonable cost, forget having it free.
The man who invented the polio vaccine, Jonas Edward Salk,
decided not to patent his invention. After seven years of rigorous research,
when he had the chance to become a billionaire, much like Jobs did, he refused
to do so. When someone asked him ‘Who owns the patent of the vaccine, he
replied, ‘Can anyone patent the sun?’ In civilisation’s history of one
individual bettering the lives of fellow humans, can Jobs stand anywhere close
to Salk?
Jobs did not even eradicate poverty with the immense wealth
he accumulated by selling his so-called great products, invented by scientists
who worked in his company. Instead, he rather stopped all philanthropist
activity by Apple in 1997, saying philanthropy can ‘wait until we are
profitable.’ Today, Apple is one of the world’s most valued companies (sitting
on $40 billion cash) and ironically, it is perhaps the only one in its category
that has no philanthropic contribution worth talking about.
I don’t own any Apple product, and most Apple aficionados
would accuse me of commenting on something that I don’t use. I am not
commenting on the products he sold; I am commenting on the tears that are being
unjustifiably shed on the death of a rich man. I am not taking anything away
from Jobs as an entrepreneur, and the fact is that he was an inspiration for
his company. But I find it difficult to accept the belittling of the very
notion of greatness by bestowing it on those who worked for themselves and
promoted the noxious idea that ‘profit motivates humans’, a theory that would
have never given us the polio vaccine.
Written
by Mr. Neeraj Thakur for Daily News and Analysis http://www.dnaindia.com/analysis/column_comment-steve-jobs-wasnt-great-he-wasnt-even-close_1596888