In
the above-mentioned Scripture, Jesus and Jews are having a heated discussion
about Abraham and his descendants. Jews were aggravated to hear from Jesus that
if they make Jesus’ word their home, they will be His disciples who will then learn
the truth and the truth will make them free. Then the matter of freedom annoys
the Jews even more because they were never slaves as the descendants of
Abraham. What Jesus tries to explain is, if anyone commits sin is the slave of
sin. Sin will bind us but Son will free us from sin.
Let
me now come to the real topic of my discussion. “Cafeteria Catholicism” is
the term used by Michael Jone’s, Fidelity
Magazine in 1986. Richard Holloway did another use in an interview in Third Way in 2001, “You get cafeteria
Christianity, a kind of shopping for ideas you approve of. They turned out to
be right for the wrong reasons, because I think that once you admit that there
are in Scripture large sections that by our standards are not just inappropriate
but scarcely moral – such as the justification of slavery.”
The
term, “Cafeteria Christianity” has taken root in the society today. I had
written an article a while ago, in which, I had mentioned about Convenient
Christianity or another term that I think of is, Bookshelf Christianity. In
Cafeteria Christianity, one picks and chooses as if sliding our food tray along
a cafeteria’s counter, referring to some Christians’ making a personal
selection of Christian teaching. One picks and chooses the stuff that one wants
and rest he discards it. The term implies that an individual’s professed
religious belief is actually a proxy for their personal opinions rather than an
acceptance of Christian doctrine. This is what happened when Charlottesville
protester chose that the Scripture to match his ideology to distance the Jewish
community. In his case, he chose to reject whole scripture and embrace only the
parts that he liked. In this way, he would have left out the full Christian
precept and tried to validate his advocacy of a different precept entirely.
In
our post-modern times, the texts that we read have put ample emphasis on so
called ‘cherry-picking theology’ where one chooses to propose an argument to
sensationalize without adequate analysis although not all. Generally, cafeteria
Catholicism is applied to Catholics who dissent from Roman Catholics moral
teaching on issues such as abortion, birth control, premarital sex,
masturbation or homosexuality. The term has been in use since the issuance of Humanae Vitae.
Cafeteria
Christianity can also be applied to the people who choose religious duties as
and when it pleases them, in other words, follow religious duties whenever it
is convenient. Hence, making God and His teachings negotiable according to our
whims and fancies. This way one limit God to only mere human faculties and do
away with God’s incomprehensive power over humanity. It is significant to be
aware of ourselves and our relationship with God, so that we may not be
“Cafeteria Christians”, rather, we might truly be Christians make Christ as the
focus of our lives both in times of challenges and joys.